Do it is thought by you is better for students to the office before their university study?

MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, easier to write, better to read.

PARAGRAPH 1 experience that is practical contacts, on the job skills. EG: Studies through the UK Government show graduates with work experience are twice as prone to find employment…..

PARAGRAPH 2
Better preparation, possiblity to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and sector that is private helps student decide on future before committing long haul, EG 1/6 students will alter their higher education course while at uni….

Lots of people genuinely believe that it is simpler to learn something in a combined group instead of individually. Can you agree or disagree?

Paragraph 1
Agree – learning in group has advantages that are many of teamwork could be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise

Paragraph 2– that is disagree is better
Self reliant, own the result, not based upon others
More mature way, more responsible
No laggards

Topic and Answer: Education (child)

Many people think that children must do organised activities within their time that is free while genuinely believe that children ought to be free to do what they need to complete within their spare time. Which viewpoint can you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to aid your answer.

PARAGRAPH 1 favour that is-In of them choose.
-benefits letting your brain wonder, children can express themselves, find themselves, do what they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent tests also show 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it would be unfair for this minority.

PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the school
-need time to plan‘equipment that is-possible to get
-furthermore research has revealed that mental performance operates better after a distraction from an organized task such as for example studying.

Topic and Answer: Globalisation

Many individuals say that globalisation while the growing wide range of multinational companies have a effect that is negative the environmental surroundings. Which viewpoint do you really agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to guide your answer. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your situation.

PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING ENVIRONMENTAL SURROUNDINGS interaction that is-Increased countries
-Increase in products or services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop of the world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these can have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP Gulf of Mexico, oil spill, destroyed the ecosystem that is local…

Scientists believe that in order to protect the environmental surroundings, people must use less energy inside their lives that are daily. However, most people have never changed the real way they live. How come you would imagine many people have not taken individual action? What might be done to encourage them to take action?

Ideas for body paragraph 1

Not taken individual action pay for a paper because:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy of this commons
– Collective problem – more straightforward to shirk responsibility

Ideas for body paragraph 2

What could be done to encourage them to take action?
– Media campaigns by the government
– Tax or incentives that are financial In Tokyo ……

Some think that may be the responsibility of men and women to manage the environment. Others say it will be the national government that will be careful of the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

Paragraph 1
People should look after the surroundings because:
we have been the consumers, we vote with our wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – individuals are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)

Paragraph 2
Government should care for the surroundings because:
They have the power to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
Supposed to be guardians of this country, which means that collectively these are typically guardians associated with the earth… yet not true in reality

Conclusion
Both should always be doing more!

In a lot of countries small shops and town centers are getting away from business, because individuals have a tendency to drive into the large out-of-town stores. This leads to a rise in car use, and it also ensures that people without cars have limited usage of stores that are out-of-town. You think benefits of such development outweigh its disadvantages?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>